3 ms·
That wasn't the point. What can you say that I can hear on a recording that would stress you out if I listen in 3 hours but not if I listen after 1 hour? Is 2
by Dah00n 3y ago
That wasn't the point.
What can you say that I can hear on a recording that would stress you out if I listen in 3 hours but not if I listen after 1 hour? Is 2 hours okay but 2,5 is perpetual suddenly? That's a strange hill to die on. Zero hours make sense. 2 and no more or less seems ... strange. Why 2 and not 3? 33? 0,3?
- mulmen 3y ago> That wasn't the point. Actually yes, it is the point. As has already been exhaustively pointed out in this thread the issue is the difference between two hours on the airplane that auto-erase and perpetual recording available to the company for whatever purpose they can dream up. > Is 2 hours okay but 2,5 is perpetual suddenly? That's not what the word "perpetual" means. "Perpetual" means "forever" as in "we never delete these recordings".
- Dah00n 3y agoDon't put words in my mouth. OP very clearly said: >"This is a proposal from the NTSB to the FAA to raise the CVR recording time from 2 hours to 25 hours, in line with ICAO." You are arguing two hours is fine, but 25 hours is "perpetual recording". That is a strawman.