3 ms·
I really don't understand what you're getting at. I don't disagree with you. The difference between this website existing for MAX and not for others is the rep
by nolok 3y ago
I really don't understand what you're getting at. I don't disagree with you.
The difference between this website existing for MAX and not for others is the repetition of issues though, to the point that now more people have had enough.
When the glass spills, the last drop might be the trigger for the glass finally spilling but it's the accumulation of water that's the issue, not just that one final drop.
- kube-system 3y agoThe bottom line is that I think it is absolutely silly for people to try to make their own judgement about the safety of aircraft they get on based on news stories about different variants of models which have had issues that are already identified. This is a relevant topic for regulators to address, with specificity to the actual offending parts, procedures, and processes in place. Avoiding all MAX variants is a very hamfisted attempt to address a very tiny difference in observed safety. There are regional airlines flying much more sketchy things. Where's "isMyPlaneACessna208BeingFlownByANewPilotInPoorWeather.com"?