3 ms·
Seems like another attempt at No-SQL. "But this time it's different!"
by pi-e-sigma 3y ago
Seems like another attempt at No-SQL. "But this time it's different!"
- fulafel 3y agoThat's how things typically take off, not on the first attempt. Depends on what's different this time. (Though NoSQL has outlived its usefulness as a concept IMO, it's just too loose to be useful beyond its early use for "something like CouchDB/Mongo", which this is clearly not)
- nineteen999 3y agoNegative SQL?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- archarios 3y agoThis is completely different from no-sql. Much more than just a different database..
- pi-e-sigma 3y agoHow exactly is it different from No-SQL? No schema? Check. No consistency? Check. (eventually consistent) Key-value store? Check. (because it's using ZooKeeper under the hood) Promising amazing results and freeing you from the chains of the SQL? CHECK!
- nathanmarz 3y agoEverything you wrote here is false, with the exception of Rama not using SQL. Rama has strong schemas, is strongly consistent, and is not limited to key/value (PStates can be any data structure combination). Zookeeper is used only for cluster metadata and is not involved with user storage/processing in any way.