3 ms·
Regardless of who is ultimately at fault, this is about people not wanting to fly on these planes. They don't care if it was Boeing or if it was a subcontractor
by philipov 3y ago
Regardless of who is ultimately at fault, this is about people not wanting to fly on these planes. They don't care if it was Boeing or if it was a subcontractor, they just want the information they need to cancel their flight or demand a different plane from the airline.
- kube-system 3y agoIf it was a subcontractor, wouldn't they want to not fly on planes made by that subcontractor?
- philipov 3y agoThose other planes aren't experiencing active safety disruption events at the moment, so no. We might not ultimately know whose fault it is, but we know which planes are faulty. 737 MAX has a history of problems, and I'm shocked they weren't shelved the first time.
- kube-system 3y agoThe planes listed on the website in this submission aren't experiencing any safety issues at the moment, either. The plug doors are only on MAX 9s, which are currently all grounded.
- wasmitnetzen 3y agoThe MCAS crashes have been on MAX 8s, and those are not grounded. I have been avoiding all MAX models since that grounding back in 2019.
- kube-system 3y agoWhy are you avoiding them now?
- wasmitnetzen 3y agoBecause I know I'd feel much more miserable during the flight compared to being on an A320. (Not that I'll feel comfortable then, I hate flying on single-aisle planes in general.)
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]