4 ms·
You are technically correct if we take the literal interpretation of my words, however, the literal interpretation is not the intended one. The intended interpr
by bheadmaster 3y ago
You are technically correct if we take the literal interpretation of my words, however, the literal interpretation is not the intended one. The intended interpretation is that no reasonable person takes /b/ seriously.
Perhaps you have some kind of impairment that prevents you from understanding subtleties of informal speech, but I think it's more likely you're just taking a piss.
> I take it seriously
Then you should check out the text under the title on /b/ :)
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
- kelseyfrog 3y agoOh, you took me literally too! So weird! What evidence would it take to change your mind?
- bheadmaster 3y agoI find your manner of discussion obnoxious, so I will refrain from replying to you anymore. EDIT: you changed your reply to make it less obnoxious, but I won't come back to this discussion regardless.
- kelseyfrog 3y agoThat's funny. I'll be here still waiting on hearing which evidence will change your mind. :)
- antonvs 3y agoThe other user is correct, your style of discussion is obnoxious, and is not contributing anything useful to the discussion. What are you trying to achieve here, exactly? Did something trigger you to start behaving in this way?
- kelseyfrog 3y agoThe question, "What evidence would change your mind?" is perfectly reasonable. It's a proxy for "Does your response to this topic involve trapped-priors?" Most people aren't willing to reveal or acknowledge they have trapped-priors and so it jumps to the end of the conversation where they simply leave. It's saves my time discussing topics by avoiding interactions with close-minded people.