> Is Intel or Nvidia even better about this? I remember when Intel brought out some new mobile processor and didn't mention it's entire name ONCE. https://www.

> Is Intel or Nvidia even better about this? I remember when Intel brought out some new mobile processor and didn't mention it's entire name ONCE. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFHBgb9SY1Y&t=17s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFHBgb9SY1Y&t=17s (This is just the most memerable part. The entire video is an interesting watch) Then they also recently (december) brought out slides about "Core Truths" in which they actually explained AMDs naming scheme decently well, while completely ignoring their own mobile naming scheme (they removed those slides very fast, but here is a video covering it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUT4d5IVY0A https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUT4d5IVY0A) Not to say AMDs naming scheme is completely faultless (e.g. they could have at least move the architecture number from 3rd to 2nd index), but I'd rather have an explained consistent naming scheme, than one that changes on how they are feeling that day (https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/processor-numbers.html https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/processor...). (Also, as a general tip: don't think too much about the naming and treat them like almost anyone does on TVs/Monitors, aka just as product identifiers)