3 ms·

I am more inclined to take that as an argument for "most of Congress" insider trades rather than "Nancy doesn't". I will leave that here though, long political

I am more inclined to take that as an argument for "most of Congress" insider trades rather than "Nancy doesn't". I will leave that here though, long political argument ahead if we keep going. Agreeing to disagree. Also, thank you for the link, these stats definitely give a more balanced view.

ceejayoz 3y ago
> I am more inclined to take that as an argument for "most of Congress" insider trades rather than "Nancy doesn't". 1/3 beat the market; that means 2/3 did not. Right? In a population of random idiots, you'd probably expect a certain amount to beat the market, a certain amount to match it, and a certain amount to flub.