3 ms·
When open source providers say 'alternative' to a commercial solution, do they consider the serious engineering needed to scale such systems? I mean I used Si
by sidcool 3y ago
When open source providers say 'alternative' to a commercial solution, do they consider the serious engineering needed to scale such systems? I mean I used SigNoz, and it's comparable to Datadog feature wise but nowhere close in performance and scalability.
- francoismassot 3y agoI must admit that 'alternative' is always a tricky word... Datadog, Elasticsearch, and Splunk are giant beasts, and the alternative makes sense only on a subset of features (and hopefully, we will successfully execute our 2024 roadmap to reduce the difference) For Quickwit, our users proved to us it was scaling up to petabytes. So we consider this scale factor in the "alternative". But... we don't have a dedicated metrics storage engine yet, so if you want to store metrics in Quickwit, it won't be efficient in the current version. It will come later this year.
- pranay01 3y agohey - SigNoz maintainer here. > it's comparable to Datadog feature wise but nowhere close in performance and scalability Would love to understand how you tested SigNoz and what were the issues you found in performance and scalability?
- ankitnayan 3y agoI have seen it ingest 500K events/s. How did you conclude the poor perf?