4 ms·
The reviews are pretty harsh, but after reading the paper, I feel they may be too generous. Somehow this paper spends several pages proving things that are both
by Imnimo 3y ago
The reviews are pretty harsh, but after reading the paper, I feel they may be too generous. Somehow this paper spends several pages proving things that are both trivial and irrelevant, and spends zero words explaining the architecture of their model. This is borderline crackpot territory.
- davesque 3y agoYeah, I sort of agree. It hardly provides any details about the model that they supposedly used to achieve only two benchmark results which are poorly described. It comes across as being written by someone that only dabbles in the topic but seems to believe they've taken some great leap forward ahead of the entire field.
- im3w1l 3y agoSounds consistent with some non-scientists working in the field, maybe for some smaller software company? They find something cool, and try to write a paper about it, which is something they aren't very experienced with.
- utopcell 3y agoAgreed. Why is this on HN again ?