3 ms·
So I think there are many layers and levels to sport engagement, and also there are clear studies that wealthier societies pump more into sport. Studies do show
by cannonpr 3y ago
So I think there are many layers and levels to sport engagement, and also there are clear studies that wealthier societies pump more into sport.
Studies do show that more well off societies get more super athletes etc. However there is also other data: https://eu.usatoday.com/story/sports/olympics/2020/02/24/survey-finds-olympic-elite-athletes-struggling-financially/111365842/ https://eu.usatoday.com/story/sports/olympics/2020/02/24/sur...
Yes their parents do need to be well off enough to support them, but these are people that still struggle and I certainly think there is a lot of data of poor people trying to get out of poverty via sport, and those will also be the most vulnerable to be pushed into destroying their bodies for it too.
TLDR I don’t think you will find many tech CEO sons doping to be the next Armstrong.
- riversflow 3y ago> I don’t think you will find many tech CEO sons doping to be the next Armstrong. Counterpoint: Rich people still end up with Heroin addictions. From what I've seen, doping is almost irresistible if you start down the path of high performance and have the cash to support it. People who are doping don't think they are destroying their body, they think they are unlocking their true potential. This is doubly true if you have enough money to hire a professional team to monitor/regulate your PEDs.
- cannonpr 3y agoFair but under that worldview which I admit is likely in athletes, one is more likely to have sound advice and a medical team trying to do their best for them, the other less so. I’d speculate a US medical team keen on a gold metal is less likely to have the same morals as a privately paid one. However one caveat, at this point I am far outside what I can substantiate via direct experience or data.