3 ms·
Is the discussion about the paper, or about how it was unilaterally rejected?
by junipertea 3y ago
Is the discussion about the paper, or about how it was unilaterally rejected?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- K0balt 3y agoMeh, let’s see an open license implementation. Unfortunately, I don’t find the acceptance or rejection of a paper in this field has much predictive value these days. By and large, the reviewers tend to be more and more like Wikipedia editors as time goes on.
- bee_rider 3y agoWhether or not the review process works, open review is a slightly different process. I’d expect a skeptic of the review process to celebrate the idea of reviewers “showing their work.”