4 ms·
You were the one to mention "legal implications", are you a legislator?
by WhereIsTheTruth 3y ago
You were the one to mention "legal implications", are you a legislator?
- EA-3167 3y agoThere are countries in which 'X' does business other than the US, which incidentally does consider Hamas and its military wing to be terrorists. It recognizes Hamas "as a whole" to be a terror group, and Qassam Brigades are a part of that whole. For example the entire EU recogizes the al-Qassam Brigades to be terrorists. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Izz_ad-Din_al-Qassam_Brigades https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Izz_ad-Din_al-Qassam_Brigades I don't need to be a legislator, because I'm simply reporting the facts rather than seeking to twist or invent them. It's simply a fact that there would be legal implications to knowingly hosting a recognized terrorist organization, this is not controversial. You can even agree with the aims of the terrorist organization, believing that they should be called something else, but still recognize the legal landscape.