3 ms·
Decent write up :+1: Recommend reading on the topic - Biggio & Rolia "Wild Patterns" review paper for the thorough security perspective (and historical accura
by dijksterhuis 3y ago
Decent write up :+1:
Recommend reading on the topic
- Biggio & Rolia "Wild Patterns" review paper for the thorough security perspective (and historical accuracy cough): https://arxiv.org/pdf/1712.03141.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/1712.03141.pdf
- Carlini & Wagner attack a.k.a. the gold standard of adversarial machine learning research papers: https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.04644 https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.04644
- Carlini & Wagner speech-to-text attack (attacks can be re-used across multiple domains): https://arxiv.org/pdf/1801.01944.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/1801.01944.pdf
- Barreno et al "Can Machine Learning Be Secure?" https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~tygar/papers/Machine_Learning_Security/asiaccs06.pdf https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~tygar/papers/Machine_Learn...
Some videos [0]:
- On Evaluating Adversarial Robustness: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-p2il-V-0fk&pp=ygUObmljbGFzIGNhcmxpbmk%3D https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-p2il-V-0fk&pp=ygUObmljbGFzI...
- Making and Measuring Progress in Adversarial Machine Learning: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jD3L6HiH4ls https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jD3L6HiH4ls
Some comments / notes:
> Adversarial attacks
> earliest mention of this attack is from [the Goodfellow] paper back in 2013
Bit of a common misconception this. There were existing attacks, especially against linear SVMs etc. Goodfellow did discover it for NNs independently and that helped make the field popular. But security folks had already been doing a bunch of this work anyway. See Biggio/Barreno papers above.
> One of the popular attack as described in this paper is the Fast Gradient Sign Method(FGSM).
It irks me that FGSM is so popular... it's a cheap and nasty attack that does nothing to really test the security of a victim system beyond a quick initial check.
> Gradient based attacks are white-box attacks(you need the model weights, architecture, etc) which rely on gradient signals to work.
Technically, there are "gray box" attacks where you combine a model extraction attack (get some estimated weights) and then do a white box test time evasion attack (adversarial example) using the estimated gradients. See Biggio.
[0]: yes I'm a Carlini fan :shrugs:
- whoami_nr 3y agoAuthor here. Thanks for your list. Every paper I read on this topic has Carlini or has roots to his work. Looks like he has been doing this for a while. I shall check out your links though some of them have been linked in the post (at the bottom) as well. Regd. FGSM, it was one of the few attacks I could actually understand and the rest were beyond my math skills and hence I wrote about it on the post. I agree with you and have linked a longer list as well. PS: I love and used to run xubuntu as well.
- dijksterhuis 3y agoNo worries. My unfinished PhD wasn't for nothing ;) Was gonna reach out to your email on your site but getting cloudflare blocking me for some javascript reason i cba to yak shave. xfce >>> gnome + KDE. will happily die on this hill.
- whoami_nr 3y agoYou can just email me at contact@rnikhil.com. For good measure, I added it to my HN profile too. Not sure about the Cloudfare thing but I just got an alert that bot traffic has spiked by 95% so maybe they are resorting to captcha checks. One downside of having spiky/non consistent traffic patterns haha. Also, yes never been a fan of KDE. Love the minimalist vibe of xfce. Lxde was another one of my favourites. Edit: Fixed the cloudfare email masking thing.