4 ms·
At least in the ham radio community, experience is that digital radio sounds better further, but at the extreme ends of signal reception the digital signal beco
by tjohns 3y ago
At least in the ham radio community, experience is that digital radio sounds better further, but at the extreme ends of signal reception the digital signal becomes completely unusable before an analog signal becomes unintelligible.
See: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cliff_effect https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cliff_effect
https://www.selby.com.au/blog/what-is-the-digital-cliff-2 https://www.selby.com.au/blog/what-is-the-digital-cliff-2
Up in the air, I can also hear AM analog voice transmissions from 200 miles away, so that's not really a good measure of performance. Both modes already do that. Benefit of having an unobstructed line of sight from several miles of altitude. :)
- H8crilA 3y agoI mean, to put it simply it would just work with a digital mode. But that's not the point, the main point is that there is no authentication mechanism. Such systems are indeed being abused, for example trains were recently halted in Poland. This happened because they have an un-authenticated channel of communication that allows anyone to do that: https://cybernews.com/news/century-old-technology-hack-brought-20-trains-to-a-halt-in-poland/ https://cybernews.com/news/century-old-technology-hack-broug... It's only a matter of time before this happens in aviation, but unlike in the trains case it doesn't have to be just an availability problem (all trains stopped safely), it can be a "remote code execution" problem.