5 ms·
This might be a controversial take, but I just can’t imagine being emotionally invested in this whole copyright drama. What’s the use case here NYT is trying t
by valine 3y ago
This might be a controversial take, but I just can’t imagine being emotionally invested in this whole copyright drama.
What’s the use case here NYT is trying to prevent? A user spending hours to force the model to regurgitate articles that may or may not be hallucination? Sorry to say it but there are far easier ways to get around the NYT paywall.
Pacifying the NYT isn’t worth it if it means we lose models like GPT4. I hope OpenAI wins this one.
- minimaxir 3y agoAny ruling on copyright in training models sets a precedent for everyone in the ML/AI space, which is a lot of people on Hacker News.
- maronato 3y agoHallucinations are a problem waiting to be solved. What happens when it is? NYT isn’t the only source affected by this. All content created and posted on the internet is subject to being used by ChatGPT. Their goal is to provide answers to any question you might have, as an alternative to browsing actual sources. If OpenAI wins and ChatGPT continues to improve, there will be no financial or social motivation to create honest content for the internet. The death of the organic internet will accelerate and all content that remains will be created by bots. Of course this is a dystopian view that may not fully realize, but if all it takes to avoid it is preventing a single corporation from succeeding, then I’m all for it.
- valine 3y agoYou really think we’re gonna be able to solve hallucination before this regurgitation problem? Please.
- visarga 3y ago> Their goal is to provide answers to any question you might have, as an alternative to browsing actual sources. You mean like the internet browsing became an alternative to actually buying newspapers? And now LLM answers an alternative to actually browsing? Let's close both the internet and AI and save journalism. Because it's gone to shit.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- halJordan 3y agoI dont think the nyt needs a use. It's their stuff. A lot of these stupid billionaire lawsuits people can't be interested in hinge on legal foundations you otherwise freak put over. Imagine having to give random nobodies a valid reason to not use your car.
- xigoi 3y agoI hate the hypocrisy of “Open”AI. They feel entitled to everyone else’s data, but they keep their own data secret and proprietary.