3 ms·
1. You can't unlearn something 2. If it's right, it's right. Why dilute the answer? 3. What happened to personal responsibility? Guns don't kill people, people
by butlike 3y ago
1. You can't unlearn something
2. If it's right, it's right. Why dilute the answer?
3. What happened to personal responsibility? Guns don't kill people, people kill people.
- unethical_ban 3y ago1. Yes you can. You can delete the training models and progress made with copyrighted material. Of course, they don't want to do that.
- itishappy 3y ago1. That's the problem. 2. Copyright. If it's a right, it's a right. 3. This is not a universally agreed upon position.
- endisneigh 3y agoYou can definitely unlearn things with respect to LLM. You retrain. It’s expensive for them, boo hoo.
- minimaxir 3y agoLLMs can't "unlearn" even with additional finetuning. Content drifts towards the newly added material, yes, but it can't forget, and artifacts will still be present.
- maxglute 3y agoI think they meant retrain from ground up. Clean room implementation. Technically feasible but not business feasible. Otherwise learn NDA and get sued for breaking it in the future.
- StreetChief 3y agoyou can start from scratch, but you cannot unlearn.
- makingstuffs 3y agoPoint three is insanely flawed for a multitude of reasons which range from the fact that a gun allows a human to kill people in the heat of the moment, to the fact that a gun enables a human to kill people from hidden/safe space hundreds of metres away.
- 6gvONxR4sf7o 3y agoWhen building automated systems, the personal responsibility thing is weird and diluted. Is it openai's fault, or the company using openai in their produce, or the client of that company, or the end user? Sometimes it seems like people are down to give b2b companies a free pass, like a B2C company should be liable for what they send their users, but openai shouldn't be liable for what they send the B2C company. Personal responsibility can apply to LLM providers too.