3 ms·
This blog post reads less like a defense and more like a PR piece trying to convince normal people that OpenAI is in the right in the lawsuit. Except that a) pr
by minimaxir 3y ago
This blog post reads less like a defense and more like a PR piece trying to convince normal people that OpenAI is in the right in the lawsuit. Except that a) pro-AI people already know the legal issues of training models and b) anti-AI people don't care.
I'm not sure who this post is for.
- siva7 3y agoMaybe there is something huge between and the world isn't as black and white as you might believe?
- minimaxir 3y agoNormally yes, but AI discourse lately is indeed that polarized and without nuance. The normals who just use the ChatGPT webapps and mobile apps don't care about the lawsuit anyways. In that case, this blog post is just a Streisand Effect.
- austhrow743 3y agoA high profile lawsuit raises questions about the stability of the service. If changing your processes to include OpenAI is expensive then that’s a big concern. Wouldn’t surprise me if their sales people are getting questioned on if the lawsuit is an existential threat and this is an attempt at giving them something.
- mikeortman 3y agobecause its a PR piece :) PR for the public, defense for the courts
- granzymes 3y agoObviously it’s a PR piece. And it’s for the same people that the New York Time’s article on their lawsuit was for. Their legal defense will come in the form of a response to the complaint and a motion to dismiss.