4 ms·
Why decades of progress in cars' fuel efficiency is ending
- gardenfelder 3y agohttps://archive.ph/y77W5 https://archive.ph/y77W5
- mouse_ 3y agoThank you!
- jdpedrie 3y agoSurely another reason is that automakers have shifted R&D investment from ICE to EV drive trains?
- francisofascii 3y ago> Americans seem to be able to resist the allure — and profits — of SUVs and pickup trucks. That seems to be the reason. Blame both the consumer who wants them and the automaker, whose marketing influences the consumer to want them. Wish we were not so foolish, but, that's seems to be what is happening.
- dewfaced 3y agoChoose 2, Power, Emissions or Economy.
- BizarroLand 3y agoWhat vehicle has good power and fuel economy but bad emissions?
- philipkglass 3y agoI think they mean economy as in cost (money). You can make a powerful inexpensive engine but it will have a worse emissions profile, or a powerful expensive engine that has a better emissions profile. But you don't get a powerful, inexpensive engine that also has a good emissions profile.
- rrr_oh_man 3y agoAny 20 year old Volkswagen with a 1.9 TDI Diesel. Excellent engine, but no green emissions sticker in Europe. Lifetime of 500,000km (300k miles) and more if treated right, fuel economy 6.5l/100km (36mpg), and can pull a small trailer with a bit of tuning. You can find it in almost all Volkswagens of the 1995-2005 era, as well as in a bunch of Audis, Seats, etc.
- hulitu 3y ago> Excellent engine If you drive it, yes. But for the driver behind you, blinded by the black smoke, no.
- rrr_oh_man 3y agoThere’s no black smoke. You only get black smoke if there’s unburnt fuel, i.e. not enough air in the mixture
- Sohcahtoa82 3y agoI would probably consider changing "power" to "size". My 2016 Subaru BRZ had 200 horsepower, averaged 32 mpg, and was $26K. Not a bad combo, if you ask me. A decent amount of get-up-and-go when you want it, but decent fuel economy when you don't. But it was also just a small 2-door sports car. Tiny trunk and worthless rear seats.