Sure, and if you show me the Pepsi logo 3000 times I can draw a pretty good copy of it. I think that's mostly irrelevant to the conversation. Logically, I find

Sure, and if you show me the Pepsi logo 3000 times I can draw a pretty good copy of it. I think that's mostly irrelevant to the conversation. Logically, I find myself on the side of the "humans aren't so special" side of this debate. We should encumber AIs with the same restrictions humans have when it comes to their "education". Sure you have to have a legal right to read/train on the material, but what you later produce is not necessarily a copyright violation. If the LLM is straight up plagiarizing copyrighted material, then yes, the vendor should be responsible for damages. Otherwise, if what we're trying to do is just sabotage these new-fangled digital looms because we don't want to compete with them, then well, I think there is a term for people that do that.