> It's funny how you can say these two contradictory things right next to each other. Fair enough, we'll agree to disagree on that one. I will happily eat crow

> It's funny how you can say these two contradictory things right next to each other. Fair enough, we'll agree to disagree on that one. I will happily eat crow if it turns out not to be the truth should there be an eventual source code/internal email leak. Keep in mind that a lot of leaks have already confirmed tech company malicious behaviors that was endlessly speculated on in the past and that it felt too blatant to be true and yet ended up true. > my "software stack and/or behavior" that somehow makes me "naughty" Not everyone gets these bans though. If your software stack or behavior allowed them to correlate you with the existing shadow profile they have on you they'll most likely let you pass and not need to bullshit-ban you since they already got your data. > The only naughty one is Meta itself Oh yeah absolutely - I always meant naughty in the eyes of Facebook, which is true. In fact you are the opposite of naughty - getting one of these bullshit bans actually suggests your online behavior is on point since Facebook couldn't just infer your personal data from tracking and instead has to force you to provide it.