4 ms·
It can be more sinister. (Disclaimer I'm not a scientist) Apparently in scientific circles, people can shoot down new claims by saying it doesn't have enough e
by hnfong 3y ago
It can be more sinister.
(Disclaimer I'm not a scientist) Apparently in scientific circles, people can shoot down new claims by saying it doesn't have enough evidence, while the "default/fallback position" (held by the "establishment") is backed by even less evidence.
I'm not saying it's a common thing, but if you're looking for "evidence based" red flags, this might also be something to look out for too.
- mrguyorama 3y ago>Apparently in scientific circles, people can shoot down new claims by saying it doesn't have enough evidence, while the "default/fallback position" (held by the "establishment") is backed by even less evidence. Please provide an example.