5 ms·
Best to not assume what others have read and this entire Kant derail is a strawman argument. Simple statistical models that don’t even have persistent memory a
by edgyquant 3y ago
Best to not assume what others have read and this entire Kant derail is a strawman argument. Simple statistical models that don’t even have persistent memory are not sentient beings and you’re the only one making such an argument, the argument I responded to was that these things learn like humans and nothing more.
Kant would laugh you out of the room for implying ChatGPT was self aware and sentient.
- logicchains 3y agoI'm not saying ChatGPT is sentient, I'm saying that when it's put in a body and learns in a RL environment (with live update) it will be; it'll essentially be indistinguishable from a human. In which case it'll seem absurd for it to be illegal for it to read copyright material without permission, but that's what the law would be if NYT gets their way.
- logicchains 3y agoI apologise for being rude, I was just frustrated at how reluctant people are to consider how negatively a ruling in favour of NYT would affect "real" AI once it comes into being.