4 ms·
> the U.S model of copyright is not the only one in the world and many other places do not believe the purpose of copyright is to foster human progress. In dem
by randomdata 3y ago
> the U.S model of copyright is not the only one in the world and many other places do not believe the purpose of copyright is to foster human progress.
In democratic places, copyright is extended for the benefit of the population at large. That does not necessarily mean fostering human progress, but it does mean something that benefits the population as a whole. Copyright can be taken away if the people at large don't see some kind benefit.
> I'm thinking you probably don't know anything about the pricing of short stories?
If exchanged for $1 per copy, you have a theoretical ~$8 billion dollar market. $65k is chump change in comparison. Hell, make it 1¢ – that's still $80 million. If you have not captured anywhere close to those numbers, you have either failed to do your work justice in distribution or it is actually worthless. Either way, in that state what is the benefit to you holding it back?
> Let's say you sell to the New Yorker http://quick-brown-fox-canada.blogspot.com/2015/02/the-new-y http://quick-brown-fox-canada.blogspot.com/2015/02/the-new-y... so you earn about 7,500 for the short story.
But in that case you can sell the copyright, so they would inherit the copyright cost. Whether or not they see $65k worth of copyright value is up to them. It would no longer be your burden if you return to your minimum wage job after the sale.
> I really find it amusing that HN of all places really wants to limit how people can make money on what is an entrepreneurial activity
I find it amusing that someone, on HN of all places, falls down to basic logic. An idea posted on an internet forum does not imply one's wants or desires.
Moreover, for practical purposes, why would you even talk about what you actually want? The thing you have chosen as your want is where you will have already put in the most thought effort. What more are you going to learn once you have settled on something? The things you don't want are going to provide a much more interesting discussion and opportunities to learn.
- bryanrasmussen 3y ago>> I'm thinking you probably don't know anything about the pricing of short stories? >If exchanged for $1 per copy, you have a theoretical ~$8 billion dollar market. $65k is chump change in comparison. Hell, make it 1¢ – that's still $80 million. If you have not captured anywhere close to those numbers, you have either failed to do your work justice in distribution or it is actually worthless. OK, well thanks for the confirmation. >I find it amusing that someone, on HN of all places, falls down to basic logic. Hey! Me too! We do have something in common after all!!
- randomdata 3y ago> OK, well thanks for the confirmation. Glad we both recognize that short stories are effectively worthless. Even the most recognized short story I know of sold for, according to your figures, basically nothing. Why are we trying to keep that under a super important lock and key again? > Hey! Me too! We do have something in common after all!! I know. You already told us in the previous comment that you were amused by it. Thanks for telling us again, I guess.