4 ms·
I think you've misread his post. He's talking about donating what they have now VS donating more money after they get richer in the future. He's not talking abo
by vibrunazo 14y ago
I think you've misread his post. He's talking about donating what they have now VS donating more money after they get richer in the future. He's not talking about donating to charities VS donating to kids from top universities. The second would just be a consequence of the first.
- _delirium 14y agoWhen do you stop, though? If you take the "first I'll get rich, then work on charitable causes" route, and Andreessen Horowitz aren't yet rich enough to qualify, what level is rich enough? Does it have to be $100 billion or something before you're allowed to decide it's time to start diverting some money to charity?
- SamReidHughes 14y agoThis is especially true assuming that the economy gets better over time, that the poor of today are worse off than the poor of tomorrow will be.