4 ms·
Note that 4 or 5 fewer death probably also translates to 8-10 fewer paraplegics (statistic made up using that fact that the country where I am from has a 2x rat
by Jyaif 3y ago
Note that 4 or 5 fewer death probably also translates to 8-10 fewer paraplegics (statistic made up using that fact that the country where I am from has a 2x ratio between death and paraplegics).
But even that does not take into account secondary effects to reducing the speed limit like fewer people traveling, less air population, people having more time to meditate, etc...
All in all, it's very hard to estimate the impact of such policy.
- pc86 3y agoAre you 2x as likely to become a paraplegic after a motor vehicle accident at 30mph as you are to die? That doesn't sound right. > fewer people traveling I don't think anyone says to themselves "it's a 20mph zone on the route so I'm not going, if it was 30 I would go." Lower speed limit != fewer travelers. > less air population Assuming you meant pollution, the same amount of cars going slower would cause more pollution in a given area, not less. > people having more time to meditate I'm sorry what? Most people don't meditate, and how is sitting in the car longer going to give you more time to meditate?
- Jyaif 3y ago> Lower speed limit != fewer travelers Longer travel times result in fewer people wanting to travel. Was not expecting this to be controversial. > The same amount of cars going slower would cause more pollution in a given area Drag is proportional to the square of the velocity > Most people don't meditate, and how is sitting in the car longer going to give you more time to meditate? Meditate is perhaps the wrong word.
- tonyedgecombe 3y ago>Assuming you meant pollution, the same amount of cars going slower would cause more pollution in a given area, not less In general the slower you drive the lower your mpg (and hence pollution).