2 ms·
You are right that parent and grandparent should have used semantic HTML instead of web. But I’m not sure I agree on your definition either. Looking at Wikiped
by wodenokoto 3y ago
You are right that parent and grandparent should have used semantic HTML instead of web.
But I’m not sure I agree on your definition either. Looking at Wikipedia, semantic web is described, first as Web 3.0 (not to be confused with web3) but I remember it more as a dream of late 90s early 2000, where all data lived on internet accessible urls and had semantic markup, than a tech stack.
- simongray 3y agoWell, it's a pretty concrete tech stack these days even if the original vision didn't take off. I actually use these technologies in my day job (and have been for several years), so it's not just a wikipedia look-up for me. Maybe that's why I think of it in more concrete terms.
- Lerc 3y ago>Web 3.0 (not to be confused with web3) I find this distinction to be rather ridiculous. They both semantically(heh) proclaim to be the next version of the web. I see there's a bit of an edit war on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_Web over the one true web 3. It's just an arbitrary name where people have incremented a number for something they wanted to be the next big thing. Realistically I think you could only really numerically name the next thing after it has actually successfully been adopted.