I applaud your effort. To give you some constructive criticism, here is some feedback. I went to the GitHub page, and on the direct link you shared, there are

I applaud your effort. To give you some constructive criticism, here is some feedback. I went to the GitHub page, and on the direct link you shared, there are multiple broken images in the readme—the demo video, technology logos, etc. It is a glaring miss that within the first content of the page is a broken video. It shows a lack of attention to detail, even large details. Next, I looked to see if there are tests/test suites for the project, as it lists working with a dozen different technologies, and I did not find one. Those dependencies will eventually have breaking changes, and with the numerous interconnected front-ends, bugs are just waiting to happen without tests. I was curious about your license fee and navigated to the Enatega website, which is very slow. It took more than five seconds to generate the HTML page. Web best practices are the largest paint of your website. It should happen in less than two seconds, and five is off the charts. I was curious if your company's website, Ninjascode, was any better, but it was even worse. It took 35 seconds for the server to send the HTML page. You will lose customers because people will not spend thousands of dollars to license and trust software when the creators cannot serve a good experience on the marketing sites and don't QA their work. That would be my overall advice: there needs to be more attention to detail. And then secondly, forming a plan to keep software error-prone as the tech stack and code changes over time.