> But it's a completely different statement, and it's wrong. Well, then I have some bad news for you regarding bananas. Which is funny, because it proves the

> But it's a completely different statement, and it's wrong. Well, then I have some bad news for you regarding bananas. Which is funny, because it proves the point of the article: The optimal amount of [bad] is usually nonzero because otherwise you have give up too much of [good].