4 ms·
Of course it's a very small step to make babies amounting to 3 times the current population of Switzerland (so assuming roughly a 50/50 female/male divide, ever
by egeozcan 3y ago
Of course it's a very small step to make babies amounting to 3 times the current population of Switzerland (so assuming roughly a 50/50 female/male divide, everyone needs to make 6 babies on average, in the same year so they will still all be babies when the last one is born? that's probably impossible for the females but we are already way into the science-fiction category) and put them all in a committee.
The more I think about this, the funnier and more complicated this gets.
- column 3y agoWhat do you mean, "that's *probably* impossible" to make 6 babies from the same mother in a single year? Takes about 9 months to output a human, you know?
- CapitalistCartr 3y agoHa! Nine women can have that baby in one month; management says so.
- kgwgk 3y ago> Takes about 9 months to output a human, you know? It can also be done months faster getting multiple humans though.
- jrm415 3y agoIt’s not impossible to have sextuplets. It’s probably impossible for a population to average that rate though.
- atq2119 3y agoTwins and larger multiples are a thing...
- egeozcan 3y ago> Takes about 9 months to output a human Takes about 9 months to output N humans where N approaches to 1 on large averages as even twin births are like 1.2 percent. Also many females cannot be pregnant again for a while after giving birth, even if we had sped up the pregnancy. To average 6 babies, we need something like giving birth to triplets every 5 months in average, which improbable even if we had the technology, will and the economics that could support this. But you know, "improbable" is such a funny word, especially out of context :)