2 ms·
Agree. Particularly the tax writeoff argument is complete bullshit. You could make an argument that you need some level of fraud to keep the anti-fraud dept on
by cm2187 3y ago
Agree. Particularly the tax writeoff argument is complete bullshit.
You could make an argument that you need some level of fraud to keep the anti-fraud dept on its toes. It’s like war. If you have an army that has never fought a war in a century, you should have no confidence you have an army at all. That’s a problem the day a real war or in this case a real fraud, happens.
- mjw_byrne 3y agoYes, and that would be a genuinely interesting point. For example, it could be compared it to the need for regular backup testing, where we generally try to maintain DR readiness with artificial testing and certainly not by accepting a certain frequency of disasters.