3 ms·
> Note that the VSL [value of a statistical life] is very different from the value of an actual life. The part about the calculation the EPA uses is very relev
by Semaphor 3y ago
> Note that the VSL [value of a statistical life] is very different from the value of an actual life.
The part about the calculation the EPA uses is very relevant:
> Suppose each person in a sample of 100,000 people were asked how much he or she would be willing to pay for a reduction in their individual risk of dying by 1 in 100,000, or 0.001%, over the next year. Since this reduction in risk would mean that we would expect one fewer death among the sample of 100,000 people over the next year on average, this is sometimes described as "one statistical life saved.” Now suppose that the average response to this hypothetical question was $100. Then the total dollar amount that the group would be willing to pay to save one statistical life in a year would be $100 per person × 100,000 people, or $10 million
- lifthrasiir 3y agoIn the other words, there is a cost function `f(p)` which is the amount of money to spend in order to prevent the fatal risk of probability p. For low enough p this function can be linearly approximated, and we named the value of `f(1)` under this approximation as the value of statistical life only for convenience. (In reality `f(1)` or even `f(0.01)` is not defined, and the true value is mostly determined after the fact.)