We can use cap table data to help us improve the software or customer experience. You’re right! For example in the above I interpreted it as a service they off

We can use cap table data to help us improve the software or customer experience. You’re right! For example in the above I interpreted it as a service they offered, not as a means of improving their own product. There were a few more instances where I misread it as a service being offered and not for internal means. So yes, too far of a tangent. I was acting as if they were offering services meant to improve the internal processes of other companies and that cap tables have basically nothing to do with that. As for managerial accounting, have you ever seen it in practice at a tech company? Has a manager ever tried to measure the cost of rapidly expanding a workforce? Or the cost of excessive meetings? Or the cost of poor architectural decisions? Or the cost of moving from one perfectly acceptable programming language or frame to another, more trendy option? Or the cost of having multiple programming languages across the organization? If you read financial reportings you will consistently find internal accounting practice based completely on financial accounting. And EBITDA is a very questionable metric for financial reporting over GAAP. There’s a trade off with accounting. Is there a level of detail where it cost more than it saves? I’d say the tech industry as a whole is very far from that point. There’s basically no detail and no understanding from administration about the actual state of the business. Berkshire Hathaway has been so successful because they don't give a shit about Wall Street projections and actually go and talk to management and walk the floors of the factory. The tech industry relies completely on moon shots. Massive digressions! But yes, I completely mistook parts of the article and was clearly more interested in standing on a soap box! But I’m not wrong, either! :)