3 ms·
Ah. Let's generously say that did happen and it works out for him at some indeterminate point in the future. Would you then consider the frozen and completely
by SllX 3y ago
Ah. Let's generously say that did happen and it works out for him at some indeterminate point in the future.
Would you then consider the frozen and completely inactive head disconnected from a living body vital for sustaining the living processes of the head of Walt Disney still living in the present? If this thread is to be completely pedantic, we have to go all the way here.
- k12sosse 3y agoNot living. But liveable. Not alive but not dead. Sort of pre- death, but post- life. How about: statically being
- calamari4065 3y agoDead until proven otherwise
- biztos 3y agoI don’t think this question can be properly answered without asking someone thus revivified.
- SllX 3y agoSo is it like naming rights for discoveries then? The first guy to get pulled out of the freezer gets to decide if he was alive or dead during his tenure as a popsicle?
- biztos 3y agoIMO all we need is one successful reanimation and suddenly those popsicles will be presumptively "alive" in a legal sense. But in a philosophical sense, yeah, every voice will count but the first voice will count most, until it's overtaken by a more eloquent one. Assuming they can even communicate.
- a_gnostic 3y ago"That is not dead which can eternal lie, and with strange aeons even death may die." –A. Alhazred