3 ms·
I am very much excited for a future workable implemtation. 1. I would much rather the opposite. Were these to be widespread like phones, id far prefer a virtua
by theshackleford 3y ago
I am very much excited for a future workable implemtation.
1. I would much rather the opposite. Were these to be widespread like phones, id far prefer a virtual communual display all can see that when not in usage does not dictate the needs and layout of my living room the other 99% of the time not to mention the space it eats in my home. (In this case Im imagining that like the vision pro, I have pretty much full world visibility to still freely engage with those around me.)
2. This sould seem to vary upon the individual. I have no such issues today, but I know others that do, though no more than the amount of people who claim fatigue and eye strain from LCD.
3. Id rather have it be in my natural field of vision and leave my hands free. Having your hands free alone would be the complete opposite of "worse in nearly every way." for many practical applications of VR.
4. See above.
The thing is though, I already wear glasses. So give it another decade or two and give me something thats almost the same size but with significantly more capabilities? Sign me up. If you aint already that way inclined, then sure, I could see the potential objections to wearing something all the time.