4 ms·
It's an approximation. If you say 220 meters, you have no wiggle room. If you say two football field's length you get the idea and it leaves wiggle room. Met
by mc32 3y ago
It's an approximation. If you say 220 meters, you have no wiggle room. If you say two football field's length you get the idea and it leaves wiggle room. Meters are too precise in this case.
If they had said furlong, that would be about right and gives enough coarseness to the measure to be effective. Unfortunately, with horseracing dying not many people are familiar with the measure any more.
- rad_gruchalski 3y agoBut they even gave an exact number in feet—about 820! About because it’s 820.21 to match the exact 250m. Where’s the wiggle room now.