3 ms·
To avoid any confusion, it’s 138 bald eagles
by louthy 3y ago
To avoid any confusion, it’s 138 bald eagles
- rad_gruchalski 3y agoNote to German readers: not Igels as your German NFL rtl nitro staff calls them.
- inkyoto 3y agoDid you use the American bald eagle wingspan (latitudinal) length or the length (longitudinal) of the said bald eagle from the tip of the beak to the end of the tail in your calculations? Considering the length of an American football field to be 109.73 metres (120 yards), and an average wingspan for the bald eagle to be 2 metres (approximately 6.7 feet), only 107 bald eagles would equate to the length of a single football field. However, if you used an average longitudinal length of 86.5 cm for the American bald eagle, one football field would equate to approximately 127 bald eagles in length, and then you have a rounding error that has crept into your calculations.
- louthy 3y ago> the earthquake extended the coastline by as much as 250 meters, I took the 250 metres (I know, I know ... a 'metre' is approximately 0.2 Ford Mustangs), and the wingspan of a bald eagle of 1.8 metres (1 Steven Spielberg). Divide the two numbers and you get 138 bald eagles. Rounding errors in unit translation may have occurred.
- rad_gruchalski 3y ago> and the wingspan of a bald eagle of 1.8 metres (1 Steven Spielberg) But Spielberg’s height is 1.72m. Did you mean Taylor Swift, Brad Pitt, or Leonardo DiCaprio?
- louthy 3y ago“Rounding errors in unit translation may have occurred.”
- inkyoto 3y agoWhich year of the Ford Mustang? Since 1 metre is 0.019 of the Ford Mustang 2024.50MY, that could have been the source of the descrepancy. It is imperative that we steadfastly adhere to the rigorous standards of scientific exactitude in the process of undertaking the pertinent observations and calculations, lest we compromise the integrity of our findings and forfeit the esteemed reputation of our learned congregation.
- louthy 3y ago> Which year of the Ford Mustang? 1971.5