4 ms·
This was an extremely interesting article. I hope Google rectifies this type of behavior. This is actually pretty scary.
by ltcoleman 14y ago
This was an extremely interesting article. I hope Google rectifies this type of behavior. This is actually pretty scary.
- typpo 14y agoThis isn't Google's fault. I could get a couple machines and do the same thing if I had a list of 250 gigs of files. And I wouldn't be limited to once every hour.
- bri3d 14y agoBut those machines wouldn't be Google's, and you would probably either be committing a crime (building an exploited botnet) or using someone's money (be it your employer, university, or yourself) to run them. This is pretty clearly a different league of attack: rather than attacking systems or spending money, you'd be exploiting a Google feature to use Google's resource for free to incur a giant amount of data transfer.
- tantalor 14y agoIt would almost certainly be criminal regardless of the method (Google, EC2, botnet).