4 ms·
They seem sketchy just based off their name from the LOTR object. From Wikipedia: "A major theme of palantír usage is that while the stones show real objects
by 7thaccount 3y ago
They seem sketchy just based off their name from the LOTR object.
From Wikipedia:
"A major theme of palantír usage is that while the stones show real objects or events, those using the stones had to "possess great strength of will and of mind" to direct the stone's gaze to its full capability.[T 2] The stones were an unreliable guide to action, since what was not shown could be more important than what was selectively presented. A risk lay in the fact that users with sufficient power could choose what to show and what to conceal to other stones: in The Lord of the Rings, a palantír has fallen into the Enemy's hands, making the usefulness of all other existing stones questionable. Commentators such as the Tolkien scholar Paul Kocher note the hand of providence in their usage, while Joseph Pearce compares Sauron's use of the stones to broadcast wartime propaganda"
- itronitron 3y agoFrom my understanding, Palantir is mostly successful because of it's utility as a data aggregator within an organization. So yeah, you have to know how to use the tools available but it's not going to stop anyone from coming to the wrong conclusion.
- 7thaccount 3y agoI was mainly saying that if you've watched the LOTR films, the Palantir (where I assume they got the name) has a pretty negative conatation and to willingly take it makes me wonder.