3 ms·
That looks fine, but how is it different that the plethora of alternate implementations of that particular UI widget? e.g. Bootstrap's popover: http://twitter.
by xyzzyb 14y ago
That looks fine, but how is it different that the plethora of alternate implementations of that particular UI widget?
e.g. Bootstrap's popover: http://twitter.github.com/bootstrap/javascript.html#popovers http://twitter.github.com/bootstrap/javascript.html#popovers
- talmand 14y agoBecause having just one of everything is boring and eventually stagnates?
- xyzzyb 14y agoAbsolutely. I just wanted to be sure I wasn't missing some new twist that this tool was providing.
- crazybuddha 14y agoBootstrap is a hover pop-up, mostly used for read-only. This is more like a click pop-up both read-write. User can click, fill in a form and submit.
- bicknergseng 14y agoAlso pretty easy to recreate using qTip2 http://craigsworks.com/projects/qtip2/ http://craigsworks.com/projects/qtip2/.
- behanpsean 14y agoI saw qTip, but looked too heavy. Prob. took as much time to write the plugin as to read the qTip docs.
- bicknergseng 14y agoNo arguments there. But I suppose if you want a tooltip framework that also bizarrely functions as modal dialogs, hover menus, alerts, notifications, ........., and maybe even tooltips, qtip2 would probably cover your bases. Either way cool plugin.
- chrisrhoden 14y agoIt also doesn't really look fine. The shadow doesn't follow the pointy bit, which looks especially bad with such a huge drop shadow. Does this even work across browsers?
- behanpsean 14y agothe css shadow isn't required.