3 ms·

Let me make sure I understand what you're putting out here. Google's web site, YouTube, which they have demonstrably gimped in Firefox at times, has a slightly

Let me make sure I understand what you're putting out here. Google's web site, YouTube, which they have demonstrably gimped in Firefox at times, has a slightly nicer "window to full screen" transition in Chrome (a Google browser) than Firefox. I just compared it on Windows (Core i5 13400 64GB, AMD 6600, 1080p) in FF versus Chrome and the transition is.... I don't know, a hair faster on Chrome? I don't even know what is "janky" about the Firefox version. I might even say it looks a little nicer in Firefox because of that fade. If I was to describe what I'm feeling right now, I think "exasperation" would be the closest word but that doesn't really begin to describe how frustrating that sort of "evidence" for Chrome's superiority is. I don't have a Linux desktop environment at the moment to compare the rest.

rational_indian 3y ago
> I don't even know what is "janky" about the Firefox version It is a bit too slow for me (tries my patience). Also Firefox does a weird multi-step transition to full-screen in which it changes to an intermediate video size which is larger than the current video size but smaller than the whole screen. I may be hallucinating this since I don't use Windows that often. I think the Firefox team agrees with me since they felt the need for a fade to/from black screen animation. > If I was to describe what I'm feeling right now, I think "exasperation" would be the closest word but that doesn't really begin to describe how frustrating that sort of "evidence" for Chrome's superiority is. I get that but I also provided a non-google example. Jupyter notebook on Firefox is laggy too (regardless of OS).