I think the difference is being in scope versus out of scope. Employee’s inflammatory behavior outside of work is mostly all downside for the company. So, they

I think the difference is being in scope versus out of scope. Employee’s inflammatory behavior outside of work is mostly all downside for the company. So, they just try to shut it down. To do some jobs at the company will risk negative press. If you get too much bad press or it isn’t worth it, eventually the person would be fired for being bad at their job. It’s like the difference between a salesman ranting on Facebook about how a competitor sucks, versus a marketing campaign that’s an attack ad on a competitor.