3 ms·
This looks really neat! I'd be interested in giving it a try, but doing so would replace existing tools and workflow. As a user, I'm unwilling to do this is I
by not_your_mentat 3y ago
This looks really neat!
I'd be interested in giving it a try, but doing so would replace existing tools and workflow. As a user, I'm unwilling to do this is I can't both own my data and application hosting.
If Nino doesn't pan out and the product gets shut down, how do I continue to access my now (trigger warning, words used to describe as I understand, not critique) tightly coupled proprietary data? Can I self host? Is source code available? Are document formats open? How do I not get screwed as an enthusiastic adopter in the unhappy case that things don't work out? If I put my data in and the product isn't working for me, how do I get my data out?
- harrisonlo 3y agoThanks. I think the concern about software provider shutting down is valid. Heck, I still remember being pissed when Google deprecated two products I used within a month (a few months back). Self-hosting might be too complex to setup, but do you think single tenant offering helps? I don't know if it makes sense for individuals tho. In addition to HTML & CSV, there is an option to export JSON, which supports more formats. In a way, it is an open format (.json) but I'll have to add relevant documentation. PDF support will also come at one point.
- buildbuildbuild 3y agoSelf-hosting is key for us as well. Companies working with sensitive data really value "on-device" / "on-premises" architecture, which it looks like you're close to nailing. Check out Bitwarden and Gitlab's self-hosting approaches, and congrats on the launch. I'm excited to try it. And regarding self-hosting complexity, start with a "docker-compose up" example and iterate from there.
- bertil 3y agoOne great solution for that would be the approach many advanced Markdown editors like Obsidian have: the documents remain usable. You might lose some benefits (the integration between documents in a graph-like structure) that are specific to the tool. Still, your work is preserved in a universal format that anyone can leverage. Most elements of Nano have widely accepted standards, presumably easy to integrate, so that guarantee should be doable.
- eviks 3y agoIt's not a universal format since a lot of data is for only for Obsidian plugins that can work work it, and it isn't universally extensible, so not suitable for proper tools this aims to be