4 ms·

I made the mistake of reading a whole New Scientist magazine once, a few years ago. Thoroughly disappointing. Sensationalist and shallow. Does not seem to be

I made the mistake of reading a whole New Scientist magazine once, a few years ago. Thoroughly disappointing. Sensationalist and shallow. Does not seem to be written for people with actual curiosity. I do not know who it is written for, although I presume they have their demographic figured out. That might be the most disappointing part.

cfn 3y ago
Thirty years I was a subscriber and it was actually decent. After a few years of subscribing I noticed a pattern of recurring articles and stopped. I considered subscribing again a couple of years ago but it was so obviously not serious science, only sensationalism, that I gave up.