3 ms·
> https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&query=%22should%20work%20without%20js%22&sort=byDate&type=all https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&p
by diggan 3y ago
> https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&query=%22should%20work%20without%20js%22&sort=byDate&type=all https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que... (25 results)
> https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&query=%22should%20work%20without%20javascript%22&sort=byDate&type=all https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que... (28 results)
So at least some are saying something along those lines. I'm sure if you search Xitter you'll find even more hits.
I think the argument is usually not made in isolation like that though, and usually with exceptions. "Websites without heavy user interaction should work without JS", "Websites should work without JavaScript, unless based on live data" and so on, which makes a lot more sense.
- draw_down 3y ago[dead]