4 ms·
This wiki article doesn't prove anything, just cities two dudes who claim that the trains didn't run on time. Excellent 'refutation'. It's like citing one rando
by pi-e-sigma 3y ago
This wiki article doesn't prove anything, just cities two dudes who claim that the trains didn't run on time. Excellent 'refutation'. It's like citing one random dude saying that Stalin was a cool guy and basing your whole argument around it.
- Wytwwww 3y agoSeems at least as credible as the people saying that all the trains were running on time?
- pi-e-sigma 3y agoIf you actually bothered to read the linked wiki article you would know that even that article actually claims that the trains service _improved_, just disputes who would be responsible for it.
- forty 3y agoIt also says "The improvement was also more apparent than real"
- pi-e-sigma 3y agoExactly this claim was based on one dude who happened to be some random Italian railways employee at the time. Regular employee, a courier, not even someone who would have even limited knowledge, such as someone dispatching rail transport on some random rail station or something like that. It doesn't refer any official statistics, even fake ones. Just one random dude's opinion. Can it be more ridiculous than that?