3 ms·
This is obviously syntactically incorrect. Although most browsers will ignore and auto-correct these errors, relying on such behavior feels a little shaky to me
by xtreme 14y ago
This is obviously syntactically incorrect. Although most browsers will ignore and auto-correct these errors, relying on such behavior feels a little shaky to me.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- tom_usher 14y agoThis is perfectly valid HTML - a lot of closing tags are completely optional [1]. Not a big fan myself because it feels like I'm leaving everything hanging, but nice to have the option. [1]: http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/HTML_vs._XHTML#HTML_Elements_with_Optional_Tags http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/HTML_vs._XHTML#HTML_Elements_wit...
- ryanwhitney 14y agoHad no idea about this—thanks.