No, double checked: > Poisoning attacks occur in the training phase by introducing corrupted data. The distinction matters because poisoning (and all other li

No, double checked: > Poisoning attacks occur in the training phase by introducing corrupted data. The distinction matters because poisoning (and all other listed attacks) impact the quality of the product and their users: I’d argue that AI providers are already incentivized to fix those. Whereas if say a hypothetical company ClosedAI is providing scammers/spammers with daily fresh loads of crap to use outside of the platform they simply make money from that. In other words, they have a first-order-incentive to be suppliers for these grey/bad actors. I guess this would be similar to the relationship between ad-platforms and scammy/shady advertisers.