3 ms·
How could your statement possibly be true? This is hugely correlative. "Good at one thing" in children generally implies "parents are involved" which generall
by bsder 3y ago
How could your statement possibly be true? This is hugely correlative.
"Good at one thing" in children generally implies "parents are involved" which generally implies "better than average socioeconomic status" which generally implies "children at least relatively decent at most educational things". This is going to be doubly true for things like art or music (or anything with private coaching) which require a significant monetary outlay in order to be good.
About the only place where this doesn't hold are the extremes where high spectrum people can function spectacularly in math and science and yet be ferociously terrible outside of that.
- User23 3y ago> "parents are involved" The most fundamental way in which parents are involved in the life of their children is through their gametes. Unsurprisingly smart kids almost always have smart parents, which is a double advantage.
- strken 3y agoIt might be the most fundamental but it's unlikely to be the most important. That award probably goes to all the things parents don't do, like drinking during pregnancy or feeding their toddler nothing but cereal and pizza for months at a time.