6 ms·
I assume that would be under "Poisoning"
by fxd123 3y ago
I assume that would be under "Poisoning"
- wizardforhire 3y agoIn the spirit of endless hn pedantics… Poisoning implies a certain amount of finesse. All poisons of course being enzyme inhibitors in themselves and enzymes being a fancy biological term for a catalyst… but digress and no. I think drowning is very much the apt descriptor of this phenomenon.
- sjfjsjdjwvwvc 3y ago[dead]
- winwang 3y ago"poison scales with dex, drowning is a weapon passive"
- klabb3 3y agoNo, double checked: > Poisoning attacks occur in the training phase by introducing corrupted data. The distinction matters because poisoning (and all other listed attacks) impact the quality of the product and their users: I’d argue that AI providers are already incentivized to fix those. Whereas if say a hypothetical company ClosedAI is providing scammers/spammers with daily fresh loads of crap to use outside of the platform they simply make money from that. In other words, they have a first-order-incentive to be suppliers for these grey/bad actors. I guess this would be similar to the relationship between ad-platforms and scammy/shady advertisers.