3 ms·
I don't know if I'd call it a superstition exactly, but there's a subset of people who are fine with foo1.plus(foo2) and bar1.plus(bar2) where foo and bar are d
by ndriscoll 3y ago
I don't know if I'd call it a superstition exactly, but there's a subset of people who are fine with foo1.plus(foo2) and bar1.plus(bar2) where foo and bar are different types, but for some reason, "foo1 + foo2" and "bar1 + bar2" is "confusing" or somehow evil. It feels a bit like they're superstitious about it. I get a similar vibe from people who have an aversion to static type inference.